Bailey's review of Michelle's sound


If the sound object does not meet the length requirements (too long / too short), what suggestions do you have? Are sources given attribution?

Meets requirements

 

Is sound the primary means of signification? If not, how might this be improved?

Yes, obviously!

 

Does the sound object convey the same meaning or message as the text / image objects? If not, what suggestions do you have? Are there any seemingly unintentional variations in aesthetics?

It tells the story very well!! 

 

Does it sound good? (transitions in remix / appropriated material? sound clean? minimal noise / static (unless purposefully meaningful)? sounds work well together? appropriate levels?

It sounds great, very clean, the transitions are nice, the levels are good, overall you chose great quality sounds to use for this piece.

 

What does the sound object convey when listened to on its own?

The exact story told in the text portion! Which is really good!

 

What suggestions do you have? Both about this object as a solo piece, and in the context of the portfolio?

My suggestion would be not to change anything because it's hilarious and very clear!